Evolution of Organization models through manufacturing eras
by rmuse70 on July 4, 2009
in Execution
The evolution of organization structures intrigued me when I started reading “The Future Arrived Yesterday” by Michael Malone. The shrinking lifecycle of a product, mass customization, and concept of disposable factories that I wrote about is taking place at an alarming speed that is going to change the dynamics of the industries. The pace of how organizations have evolved – Joint Ventures, Outsourcing, Offshoring, and Captive centers over the last 20 years has been faster than the previous 200 years. I am not an expert in the field of Organization Behavior, but I believe the evolution of Organization Structures due to rapid deployment of technologies, and infinite bandwidth will have implications that are far-reaching in Designing Operating Models (Business Processes, People, and Ownership & Metrics). Michael Malone talks about “The Protean Corporation” structure & concept of “Shape-Shifters” as the evolution of Organization Model. In my opinion, this concept is taking hold in some form at some levels of every company.
The history of “Six Epochs of Change” by Ramchandran Jaikumar, brings relevance to the argument whether the Organizations should continue evolving -
|
|
NATURE OF WORK
|
|

|
|
|
The Craft/Guild System [1780]
|
|
| |
|
|

|
|
Standards for Work
|
Absolute product
|
|
Work Ethos
|
“Perfection”
|
|
Worker Skills Required
|
Mechanical craft
|
|
Control of Work
|
Inspection of work
|
|
Organizational Change
|
Break-up of guilds
|
|
Staff/Line Ratio
|
0:40
|
|
Line workers per machine
|
15
|
|
|
The English System [1800]
|
|
| |
|
|

|
|
Standards for Work
|
Relative product
|
|
Work Ethos
|
“Satisfice”
|
|
Worker Skills Required
|
Repetitive
|
|
Control of Work
|
Tight supervision of work
|
|
Organizational Change
|
Staff-line separation
|
|
Staff/Line Ratio
|
20:130
|
|
Line Workers per Machine
|
3
|
|
|
The American System [1860]
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
Standards for Work
|
Work standards
|
|
Work Ethos
|
“Reproduce”
|
|
Worker Skills Required
|
Repetitive
|
|
Control of Work
|
Loose of work/ tight of contingencies
|
|
Organizational Change
|
Functional specialization
|
|
Staff/Line Ratio
|
60:240
|
|
Line Workers per Machine
|
1.6
|
|
Focus of Control
|
Process conformance
|
|
Instrument of Control
|
Stop watch
|
|
Rework (as fraction of total work)
|
.25
|
|
|
Scientific Management (The Taylor System)
1880-1890
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
Standards for Work
|
Process standards
|
|
Work Ethos
|
“Monitor”
|
|
Worker Skills Required
|
Diagnostic
|
|
Control of Work
|
Loose supervision of contingencies
|
|
Organizational Change
|
Problem-solving teams
|
|
Staff/Line Ratio
|
100:200
|
|
Line Workers per Machine
|
1.3
|
|
|
The Statistical Process Control Era (1930)
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
Standards for Work
|
Technology standards
|
|
Work Ethos
|
“Develop”
|
|
Worker Skills Required
|
Learn/ generalize/ abstract
|
|
Control of Work
|
No supervision of work
|
|
Organizational Change
|
Product-Process Program
|
|
Staff/Line Ratio
|
20:10
|
|
Line Workers per Machine
|
0.3
|
|
|
Computer Integrated Manufacturing
|
|
Tagged as:
American System,
Computer Integrated Manufacturing,
Craft System,
English System,
Guild System,
Manufacturing,
Organizational Structure,
Outsourcing,
SPC,
Statistical Process Controls,
Taylor System